One of my blogging habits is to collate pro and con posts on a particular issue.
One reason to do is that each blog has its own set of commenters and often the comments reveal aspects of the issue previously not considered elsewhere.
Today's issue is the UK's General Medical Council's ruling on Andrew Wakefield.
I've included this post in the list.
The list can be found at http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2010/01/andrew-wakefield-dishonesty-misleading-conduct-and-serious-professional-misconduct.html
It will be interesting to see the blog responses over the next few days. Currently the "Andy Wakefield is a hero of science and will be vindicated" posts stand at 12; the "GMC findings are correct. Good science is eventually self-correcting" posts stand at 43.
I am a college student living in Moorhead, Minnesota (just across the river from Fargo). My interests are in science, history, politics, current events, and philosophy. I have Asperger's Syndrome, a high-functioning form of Autism.
One of my blogging habits is to collate pro and con posts on a particular issue.
ReplyDeleteOne reason to do is that each blog has its own set of commenters and often the comments reveal aspects of the issue previously not considered elsewhere.
Today's issue is the UK's General Medical Council's ruling on Andrew Wakefield.
I've included this post in the list.
The list can be found at
http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2010/01/andrew-wakefield-dishonesty-misleading-conduct-and-serious-professional-misconduct.html
It will be interesting to see the blog responses over the next few days. Currently the "Andy Wakefield is a hero of science and will be vindicated" posts stand at 12; the "GMC findings are correct. Good science is eventually self-correcting" posts stand at 43.